Kuponaut
CodesComparisonsGuidesCalculatorAboutContactSubmit a couponTR

Kuponaut › Blog

How to Build a Client Enquiry Tracker with MeDo

MeDo generates applications from a written brief and provides areas for previewing, editing and publishing the result. It suits someone exploring a small custom workflow, such as tracking enquiries, who can review the generated behaviour. This guide uses fictional records and treats privacy and access checks as requirements, not as features to assume the generator has solved.

By Fırat Papatya · Published · 6 min read

Affiliate disclosure: the MeDo partner link in this article may earn Kuponaut a commission at no extra cost to you. O1IESEYO is an exclusive code issued to Kuponaut by MeDo. Prices are from Kuponaut’s pricing record of 14 October 2026 and can change. This guide is based on official documentation, not a personal product review.

Step 1: write the enquiry workflow in plain language

Describe who creates an enquiry, who may read it and what happens when its status changes. Separate a public contact form from a private staff view. Use fictional names and contact details in the brief. State that visitors must not be able to see other people's enquiries, and that private staff functions require appropriate access control.

MeDo's first-app tutorial describes entering requirements, reviewing and editing the requirements document and then generating the app. Use that review to remove unnecessary features before generation. A request such as build a complete CRM is difficult to evaluate; a small enquiry list with an explicit status workflow is easier to inspect. A requirement written in the prompt is still a requirement to check afterwards, not proof of implementation.

Example brief to adapt: Build a prototype enquiry tracker with a public submission form and a private staff list. Store the requester name, contact address, project summary and status. Staff can review and update an enquiry; visitors cannot browse stored enquiries. Use fictional records only. This is a requested specification to inspect after generation, not a statement that MeDo automatically implements those permissions correctly.

Step 2: generate the draft and inspect the interface

The interface tour documents the prompt area and the Website project type, along with Preview, File, Code and Backend areas. Use the appropriate creation flow for the proposed browser-based tracker. After generation, open Preview and follow the intended visitor journey. Read the labels and remove any sample claims that are not part of your actual business process.

Distinguish working behaviour from visual placeholders. A status menu that changes on screen does not necessarily prove the change was saved. A login page does not prove that protected records cannot be accessed another way. Keep a written checklist of the behaviour you requested and ask for targeted corrections, naming the page and action rather than requesting a vague improvement to the entire app.

Step 3: check the data flow using fictional records

MeDo's preview documentation explains that draft and live versions can share the same database unless separate backend environments are used on supported plans. This is an important boundary: a preview is not automatically an isolated sandbox. Before entering sample records into an existing project, understand which backend is connected and whether those records could appear in the live application.

General functional-check advice: submit a fictional enquiry, inspect where it appears, update its status and reopen the page. Check the logged-out view and the intended staff view separately. Try to access a record from an account that should not see it. If the access rule is unclear or fails, do not publish with real customer information. Seek appropriate technical review rather than assuming the generated interface is secure.

Step 4: publish only after the workflow is reviewable

MeDo's release documentation describes Publish, then Publish Now, followed by an Access Link when the release is ready. It also describes Update and Update&Publish for later changes. Review the public version independently after publishing. Confirm which version is visible and repeat the essential workflow checks with fictional information, keeping the shared-backend caveat in mind.

Decide who will maintain the application and how an incorrect record will be corrected or removed. Keep the public explanation modest and specific. Do not advertise a secure customer portal merely because a generated screen includes a lock icon or sign-in form. If the project is still a prototype, keep it limited to appropriate demonstration data until its behaviour and handling process are understood.

Tips for controlled revisions and useful checks

MeDo documents an AI quality-analysis feature that inspects aspects of an application, including interactions and backend behaviour. Treat its findings as assistance; MeDo's documentation states that it is not a security check. Verify any proposed correction against the actual workflow. An automatically resolved visual issue does not establish that permissions, data retention or every failure path have been reviewed.

Change one functional area at a time and preserve a description of the last acceptable version. Check empty states, incorrect input and what happens when a request fails. Keep customer data out of screenshots used for troubleshooting. If the app needs functions beyond your ability to inspect, involve someone who can assess them before expanding its public use.

Credits and a published app's ongoing requirements

Kuponaut’s pricing record separates free login-bonus credits from subscription credits and lists paid monthly allocations. Do not assume that a free balance behaves like a recurring paid allowance. Check the credit information shown for the next operation before asking for a large rebuild. Refine the requirements before generation so that repeated changes have a clear purpose rather than consuming capacity through experimentation.

The release documentation also distinguishes backend availability and a Backend Keep-Alive option. A published URL does not by itself establish uninterrupted backend operation. MeDo's release documentation says a Free-plan backend pauses after five consecutive inactive days and that keep-alive is a Pro and Max feature; no keep-alive price is recorded here. Confirm the current hosting and backend requirements for the intended use before relying on the tracker as a business-critical system.

Recorded prices, plan allowances and the Kuponaut offer

Prices recorded on 14 October 2026 (USD): Free $0 (no subscription credits; daily login bonus of 80 credits, up to 400 a month), Pro $20 a month or $200 a year (2,000 credits a month), Max $50 a month or $500 a year (6,000 credits a month). Enterprise from $39.90 a month for 2 seats, then $19.95 per extra seat. Subscriptions and unused credits are non-refundable except for billing errors or where the law requires. On 15 Oct 2026 MeDo’s site was also showing a public 20% promotion that is applied without a code; check whether it is still running at checkout.

The brand’s partner programme lists O1IESEYO as Exclusive Kuponaut promo code (discount shown at checkout). MeDo's team issued it to Kuponaut by email on 16 October 2026; MeDo did not state the discount amount, eligible plans or an expiry date, and Kuponaut has not tested it at checkout. Check the eligible plan and final total before paying. Kuponaut has no expiry date on record for this code, which does not mean it will last indefinitely.

O1IESEYO has no percentage in Kuponaut’s pricing record; its discount must be read at checkout. The public 20% promotion mentioned in Kuponaut’s pricing record is a separate offer and is not described here as the value of the Kuponaut code; Kuponaut’s record notes that codes usually cannot be combined, so compare the checkout total with and without O1IESEYO.

A MeDo tracker or a simpler form-based process?

Weblium's official form documentation describes adding contact forms to website blocks (on Pro sites, according to that article). That is a narrower alternative when the real need is collecting enquiries for someone to answer manually. MeDo's documented app workspace provides a route to generating a custom workflow, but a broader project also creates more behaviour and access rules to review.

Start with a form and a manageable internal process when that meets the business need. Consider a custom tracker when a specific status or access workflow justifies it and someone can maintain it. This is not a claim that either product is inherently more secure; the relevant question is what has actually been configured and checked for the intended use.

Related code pages

Links

Listed on
Product HuntAI Just BetterAlternativeToF6SGitHubZenodoPostYourStartupLaunchBeamAITNT NewsCrunchbaseSaaSHubIndie Hackers